Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Teugels


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Patrick Teugels

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources to show that this person is WP:NOTE. The sole claim to fame is that he reached the final of the World Association of Kickboxing Organizations world championship and on the way was the only person ever to beat Jean-Claude Van Damme. There don't seem, however,to be any reliable sources for this, and looks dubious since the WAKO article claims that in world championships, "Each member country can present only 1 competitor in each weight class." If this is correct, then Belgian Teugels can never have beaten Belgian Van Damme in those World Championships. There are 44 distinct Ghits for Teugels excluding Wikipedia and Van Damme, establishing quite firmly that he has little to no notability outsidehis claim of beating Van Damme (so not a notable painter or something similar). Of the 122 distinct hits linking him with Van Damme. So in general: Patrick Teugels exists and is a painter, but his sole claim to fame is currently unverifiable. Fram (talk) 12:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. As a contributor here in wiki on kickboxing, i agree he's not a notable kickboxer. Maybe you can tag those as well: Alejandro DasCola, Bernardo Jua, Wilver (Rio) Johnson. Marty Rockatansky (talk)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, X  clamation point  03:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.