Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Tiquet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Thanks everyone for participating. :) Please assume good faith with my decision. If you believe this article was deleted without good reason, please request undeletion at deletion request, not my talk page. Thank you. SarahStierch (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Patrick Tiquet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This computer businessperson may be sufficiently notable — but certainly nothing in the article shows that — and the descriptions make it difficult to tell just how notable or not he is. As it stands, delete unless there is further showing of notability. --Nlu (talk) 04:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete obvious vanity article DocumentError (talk) 06:40, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete shows absolutely nothing notable beyond just doing a job for which he's paid for. --gilgongo (talk) 00:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.