Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Vahe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The sources provided have not been explicitly refuted with respect to GNG. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Patrick Vahe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Eagles   24/7   (C)  20:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  Eagles   24/7   (C)  20:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom, fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Onel 5969  TT me 20:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. College offensive linemen almost never get significant coverage.  Vahe is an exception who passes WP:GNG with significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources. Examples include: (1) this two-parter from March 2017; (2) another two-parter from November 2015; (3) this from February 2015, and (4) this from August 2018; (5) this from August 2017; (6) this from August 2017; (7) this from August 2017; (8) this from September 2016; (9) this from November 2015; and (10) this from August 2013; and (11) this from August 2017. Cbl62 (talk) 21:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep yeah although he didn't make the roster seems notable from his College days.Getmefood (talk) 12:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 *  Delete The first criteria in WP:NGRIDIRON says that to be notable the player must "have appeared in at least one regular season or post season game in any one of the following professional leagues: the Arena Football League, the Canadian Football League, the National Football League, the fourth American Football League, the All-America Football Conference or the United States Football League, or any other top-level professional league." He does not meet this criteria. Some have also highlighted that rule number 2 seems to offer an exception to this rule and that exception is that "unless they meet another criterion, such as notability arising from their college football days."  I don't thinkNCAA players are inherently notable like the the NFL noted above and he also fails WP:NCOLLATH. IndusFish (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your premise is flawed. It is long- and well-established that college football players are notable if they pass WP:GNG. See WikiProject College football/Notability. Cbl62 (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. I'm new. I tried my best to interpret. Should I delete my comment? IndusFish (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your opinions are always welcome, IndusFish. Cbl62 (talk) 22:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per Cbl62's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 08:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep meets GNG per Cbl62. Lepricavark (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.