Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patriotic Nigras


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn by nom. – iride  scent  19:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Patriotic Nigras

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This has now been db-web deleted twice. Rather than keep playing whack-a-mole, bringing it over to either get a consensus that it's notable enough to warrant keeping, or get a consensus that it's deletable so it can be G4'd next time it appears. Personally, I see no reason why an group of players within an online game is notable, sourced or not, but am perfectly willing to be convinced. – iride  scent  20:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep They have had two articles in the New Scientist and one in The Telegraph, as well as many other less reliable sources, so they do meet the primary notability criteria. I know an in-game group does not seem like it would be notable but people are obviously interested in them. - Icewedge (talk) 20:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I just found this, how does crashing the SL servers (see this Wired article) count for notability? - Icewedge (talk) 21:37, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep They sound like a reprehensible group of racist internet bullies/cowards, so if I could oppose on IDONTLIKEIT grounds, I would. However, there is coverage in multiple reliable sources, so I am inclined to support.  Mr. IP  《 Defender of Open Editing 》 23:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, you know you spend too much time at RfA when you vote "support" in AfD for something called "Patriotic Nigras"! Make that "keep".  Mr. IP  《 Defender of Open Editing 》 23:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep meets WP:RS and thus WP:N. The article is pretty well written for a group of idiots, which is essentially what they are. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 23:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I (the article creator) would just like to assert that I am not a member of the Patriotic Nigras. - Icewedge (talk) 00:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep check 4chan and ED articles for sources (See the Julian Dibbell talk cited on the ED article, he talks about PN). Meets the WP:GNG marginally. Protonk (talk) 19:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - Per just about everyone above. No problems.   Asenine   19:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.