Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patriotourism: A Pro-Active Route to Recovery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Patriotourism: A Pro-Active Route to Recovery

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't quite go with a speedy when an article has been around this long and edited by several, but I'm personally voting for G11 speedy deletion in this AfD. Rationale: read the article, it's short. - Dank (push to talk) 02:52, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 02:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 02:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious spam -- it's even written in the first-person singular -- and of the "several" who have edited, if you discount the bots, it's one making a single minor spelling correction, one adding a verify tag, one removing an outdated press release -- and the article creator writing in the first-person. --Calton | Talk 16:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Right. I can't bring an article to AfD and say "you have to vote G11", that would kind of undermine the point of AfD, but I personally believe this to be an easy call.  If we get consensus, then we can speedy it and be done with it. - Dank (push to talk) 17:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, speedy delete for spam --Saalstin (talk) 18:36, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spam....spam based on a WP:NEO at that. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:04, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.