Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patryk Wezowski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 10:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deprodded. I stand by my original rationale: "I am afraid this entry may be failing Notability (people). No mainstream, reliable sources seem to provide any significant coverage of that person." Pinging User:Tachs, User:Jodi.a.schneider. Creator notified. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Quoted in a few reliable sources, but that doesn't satisfy WP:BIO, which requires non-trivial third party coverage. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep I am here to give my concern on the flags raised on current article page. I created this page because I am a big fan of Patryk Wezowski and his lectures on Body Language. This made me create a wikipedia article on him. I started reading the guidelines and asked someone in the IRC chat to create the article for him. But they suggested I should go for creating the article myself. I created this article as I found him notable for cbs, fox, harvard, tedx, his books and an award winning documentary. References for these are already used in the article. Wezowski is the executive producer of the award-winning documentary Destressed, winner at Garden Stage Film Festival this is also mentioned at the end of the interview here:  He was awarded in the Garden State Film Festival.I have read about the general notability and I find that he falls under the general notability criteria. Though I tried to keep the langauge neutral still if admin finds the language written as advertising then I would request other contributers to tweak it for neutrality. I would also request admins to clear the orphan issue as I have no idea to get it clear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie.rodricks (talk • contribs) 17:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The rationale behind accepting this article was that I found the subject of the article to be notable, established by adequate third party references and the area of his work, worthy of reference for any encyclopedia user. As the cardinal reason for checking on an encyclopedia is for reference and not for random reading, I felt the subject should not be denied space. --jojo@nthony (talk) 18:47, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. WP:NOT, WP:ADVERT. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Definite Keep I don't think this is a subject to debate as he is notable in Belgium and outside too. I strongly agree with Tachs(jojo@nthony). As per the notability criteria if a person is notable in a country and has national media appearances then his article can be created. I would like to vote for his notability.He has been listed in national media of Belgium and here are the links to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valentin1958 (talk • contribs)      The links showing his notability outside are already used on the project page.


 * Comment These sources are about one single aspect of his work: the Center for Body Language. He is not forefronted in any of this. As he an "Antwerp specialist" it seems reasonable that he would be more widely quoted in Belgium than elsewhere. However, it doesn't seem to me that simple quotes establish his notability. Of the links you give, this, this, and do seem to talk about him significantly. The article as written would be better condensed into microexpressions in my opinion. If we are going to keep an article, it needs to be pared down until it is not promotional and focuses on e.g. the newspaper articles given.Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 22:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.