Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pattaravakkam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌺Kori🌺  - ( @ ) 14:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Pattaravakkam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted because it is not a significantly covered place. I could not find any reliable sources. Article has been unsourced since November 2006, meaning that it is likely that nobody else found any sources either. 🌺Kori🌺 - ( @ ) 01:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — I struggled to find any decent sources as well, and couldn't find any which would help expand the article. Allenthalben (talk) 17:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - It is a distinct neighborhood with even its own post office and train station.Oakshade (talk) 03:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , there really aren't any other reliable sources for that either. Also, just because it has a post office doesn't mean it's automatically notable. 🌺Kori🌺  - ( @ ) 05:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * There are no sources that it has it has a train station? And we better tell the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India that they're not a reliable source because according to them there are 1,441 people living there. (added link to my first comment) Oakshade (talk) 05:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:25, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND as confirmed above. Phil Bridger (talk) 06:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND: a populated place that is legally-recognized by the Government of India . North America1000 01:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:NGEO as provided above, a thanks to for referencing the article, has anyone else noticed there appears to have been an increase in the number of afd nominations of articles unreferenced from 2006? to all the editors looking at these articles, keep up the good work! Coolabahapple (talk) 23:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , They're mostly coming from Category:Articles lacking sources from November 2006. I've PRODed and AFDed a lot of them. 🌺Kori🌺  - ( @ ) 05:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - per WP:GEOLAND - and NB please that there's no substitute for an adequate WP:BEFORE.Ingratis (talk) 10:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.