Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patti Sacks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:38, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Patti Sacks

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No evidence of meeting WP:ENTERTAINER or the general WP:N guidelines, which requires non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent third-party sources, nor is it likely that said evidence is out there, given that she appeared in three, uncredited roles. Canadian  Paul  17:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article itself admits that she fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Qworty (talk) 19:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete credited with three uncredited rolls? That is not credited at all. noq (talk) 19:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 16 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - it fails any kind of notability test, seems can be speedily deleted even. JoshuSasori (talk) 00:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete... But to be fair, she is not entirely unsourcable... and in 1939, 1940, and 1944, only the bigger names received an onscreen credit. Heck, the further back one looks in film history of onscreen credits, the less likely that any but the top three actors received any onscreen notice by the studios. THAT in itself would not form my opinion. There was a flurry of news blurbs in 1948 and 1952 making reference to her divorce from Fred Karger, an early husband of Jane Wyman, but nothing much about her work as an actress. Looks like Patti finally become an attorney as she had planned, but she does not have enough coverage to meet WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:49, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.