Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patuk Don


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. With no prejudice to a speedy renomination Davewild (talk) 08:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Patuk Don

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no evidence that this subject exists. Google returns no hits.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment. I'd like to save this one; our coverage is very poor in this area. We don't appear to have an article on the king or his dynasty ... I found someone who has published articles online on Nepalese architecture and culture and republished them as a book, who calls it Patuk Deon. His source is a 1980 book by an Indian expert who says the local name is Patukadon. Both refer to it as a mound that is reputed to be the ruins of the palace but has not been archaeologically investigated. I have added both references and the info, but I find nothing else, including no hits on the Nepalese. What I've found does not justify an article, but I hope someone who can read Nepalese can do a proper search; it's entirely possible Google won't even show me such material. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; kikichugirl  oh hello! 03:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:41, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.