Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patxi's Chicago Pizza (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 18:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Patxi's Chicago Pizza
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

trivial reviews and mention, none of which show notability  DGG ( talk ) 19:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. This restaurant chain has received plenty of coverage from reliable sources. In addition to the sources that were already cited in the article, I also added citations to an article from Time Magazine, an article in USA Today, an article in the San Jose Mercury News, and an article from the San Francisco Business Times. This article definitely passes WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Patxi's has received coverage not only for its food but also for a legal issue Thisisnotatest (talk) 08:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as properly sourced per notability guidelines. VMS Mosaic (talk) 01:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The only non-trivial coverage is from a few reviews in its local markets. Several of the articles (including the Time Magazine piece) only mention it in passing because of the "Home Alone" publicity stunt. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to pass WP:GNG based upon referenced coverage beyond the usual, trivial diner reviews and store openings. Cubbie15fan (talk) 20:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.