Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul-Alain Beaulieu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Paul-Alain Beaulieu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article should meet WP:ACADEMIC. Tried my best to reference the article, but no dice. With greatest respect to Professor Beaulieu, I haven't been able to find anything that meets the significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject test. In particular, I haven't been able to find anything about his work at the University of Toronto except LinkedIn, FaceBook and passing mentions otherwise. Please, prove me wrong. Shirt58 (talk) 11:28, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I do prove you wrong by clicking on the Google Scholar link supplied above. There are some respectable cites there for a poorly cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. He seems to be a well-established and well-respected Assyriologist. I'm finding multiple reviews of his books (four reviews of three books, so far) which I'll be adding to the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:02, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per pending rescue by David Eppstein. Bearian (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.