Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Amadeus Dienach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Paul Amadeus Dienach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficiently sourced to demonstrate notability. I believe that this is a fictional character invented by Papachatzis as a literary device, and don't see any references that even suggest otherwise; the "Daily Star" article is not at all credible and the only other reference is the book claiming to be his notes. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 04:48, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete without strong sources otherwise this person appears to be a fictional individual, and the coverage does not justfiy having an article devouted to this figure in fiction.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete (or at most a redirect to Georgios Papachatzis), doesnt meet WP:ANYBIO, Worldcat shows low (5) library holdings for the book, Chronicles, (not a good sign for a/most book writer(s):)) while a gsearch brings up nothing useable, btw, the greek wikiarticle on Papachatzis (they dont have one on Dienach) has nothing to add. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:00, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 03:12, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nomination. Nothing notable, or documanted sufficiently by reliable sources. ——Chalk19 (talk) 11:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.