Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Barry (teacher)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Paul Barry (teacher)
Completely non-notable teacher. The article contains two apparent claims of notability: a claim that he won the Order of Canada, which appears to be a hoax, because I can't find a source for it, and a note that he is a member of the OFSAA hall of fame. While this appears to be true, a glance at the list of members comes up with a few hundred names; hardly an elite club. I fully expect the student jokers who have been replacing the journalist article at Paul Barry with an attack page version of this article for the last few weeks to meatpuppet this vote in droves, but it'd be nice to be rid of this once and for all. Ambi 01:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, absolutely non-notable. Tito xd (?!? - did you read this?) 01:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, at least partial hoax as the Order of Canada member database has no results for anybody with the last name 'Barry'. Lord Bob 01:48, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn and likely hoax. Sarah Ewart 03:00, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:34, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete off to uncyclopedia for you. Agnte 15:50, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - not an order of canada recipient . Not notable enough. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 17:02, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn teacher, hoax, etcetera. Bjelleklang 18:03, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete false and nn. cj | talk 05:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax. --YUL89YYZ 17:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete no credible sources on which an article could be written red stucco  09:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a hoax, and the remaining article has no serious notability claims.  --Rob 11:39, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete nn-bio and/or delete unverifiable. Stifle 02:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.