Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Benhaim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Paul Benhaim

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP with primary sources, and sources on products. Like Zelfo, promo, COI, somewhat spammy. A coatrack with few RS for a BLP. Widefox ; talk 08:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete looks like a blatant advert. Most of the sources are about the product and not the person. LibStar (talk) 18:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  06:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: -- fails WP:GNG; appears overly promotional in nature; more befitting an infomercial.  Quis separabit?  02:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.