Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Burnham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   08:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Burnham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient notability Wsnx (talk) 08:19, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep As per WP:GNG. There is sufficient reliable 3rd party sources for the article. Plus the nominator's lack of cite to any policy and rationale "insufficient notability" has not been supported by any further statement makes me recommend a WP:SNOW close for this.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 09:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per The C of E. StAnselm (talk) 05:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per The C of E. - Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 01:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.