Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Davidge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Paul Davidge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete as the article fails the notability criteria, both specific and general. It looks suspiciously like a self-penned article and the editor's contributions seem to be exclusively about this subject. Despite a claim to the contrary in the infobox, a leading online source indicates that the subject has never played in a match that would be rated top-class in domestic cricket and so I believe he fails the sport-specific notability criteria on that point. On the general notability, there cannot be sufficient media coverage of someone who has played minor cricket only. Ziggy (talk) 11:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. I should point out that I tried to access cricketarchive.co.uk which is named as a source in five places but it is a subscription site. To be fair, it is possible that this site may have information not given on espncricinfo to support notability. Ziggy (talk) 15:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. In addition, I went to qsdca.com.au (cited three times) and searched for the player but, despite a number of inputs using various formats, the result was "not found" which would indicate that this site, belonging to the Queensland Sub Districts Cricket Association, is not a true source for the subject. Ziggy (talk) 15:54, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per nom, a check of cricketarchive site shows all matches are minor and Davidge has not played in any of sufficient status to reach notability level for an article. RossRSmith (talk) 08:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per nom. I too checked CricketArchive and agree with RossRSmith. JH (talk page) 16:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.