Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul E. Marek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Paul E. Marek

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable blogger. No evidence found of WP:BIO. Sole "claim to fame" appears to be an essay that was republished widely online and a few independent books, and discussed mainly on blogs and user forums. A few mentions in unreliable user forums, and op-ed contributions, do not satisfy WP:JOURNALIST. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Writing an essay isn't proof of notability at all, and that seems to be all the subject has. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:48, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - his essay may be notable if it were the subject of reviews and commentary (but probably not), but Marek himself does not seem to be covered in sufficient reliable sources. Smmurphy(Talk) 17:56, 31 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.