Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Eastlund

Paul Eastlund
Vanity, now with 400px high pictures of the guy. Coming soon to theatres near you. --fvw* 02:37, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC) - votes and comments by anon editors.
 * I've retracted my vote and am abstaining. Evercat 02:52, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity or libel, not sure which. And you have to be an eleventh level wizard to get your own article here.  Seriously, editors of conservative campus newspapers have gone on to notable things.  This one hasn't yet. Gamaliel 02:57, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete editor of a college newspaper, same as thousands of other people. that's not particularly notable.  vanity, with picture goodness. Wolfman 03:36, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * EXTREME DELETION is in order. [[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 03:54, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Cornell Review is an unusually notable campus newspaper, founded by Ann Coulter no less. But Eastlund is no Ann Coulter. (For which he should, arguably, be very proud.) Delete, unless article becomes something very different, is clearly not vanity, and establishes notability before the end of VfD. Samaritan 04:49, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Deletionist 04:54, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: A college student. It takes more than shouting to be encyclopedic.  Geogre 05:39, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --JamesTeterenko 05:43, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. jni 08:12, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. If he's really that notable, then merge into Cornell Review. David Johnson 12:17, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. harlancrystal
 * User's only edits are here and to Paul Eastlund.
 * Delete. Loud fish in a little pond. Might warrant one line in the Cornell Review article. Which he already has. Average Earthman 17:16, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --[[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 22:48, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete Whether it be for vanity, non-notability, pranksterism or whatever, it just doesn't belong here. DreamGuy 04:37, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Death to vanity. --Minority Report (entropy rim riot) 01:40, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, wait for accusations of Wikipedians' liberal bias. &mdash;tregoweth 18:53, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, but notice the objection on the talk page: "we are trying to add a series of such figures over time. If you must attack our page, give us more than 20 minutes to build the damn thing first." I've seen this complaint on a couple different occasions; perhaps VfDers are becoming a little hasty? -leigh 09:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. I go to Cornell and I assure you this is a real issue.  Eastlund is known pretty much across the state.  10:02, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Notice that there's already a wikipedia entry for the paper he is the editor of.
 * Unsigned comments from 128.253.117.62. User's third and fourth edits.
 * Delete. I don't know why my friends made a damn wikipedia entry about me. -Paul Eastlund
 * Unsigned vote from 68.192.149.117.