Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Edward Jessup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Paul Edward Jessup

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG No significant coverage about the businessman exists in reliable sources. Lots of single line quotes, but nothing substantial. W 42 15:57, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  W 42  15:57, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Businesspeople,  and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with nom, only brief quotes about him found. Oaktree b (talk) 17:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Oaktree b. Nothing in this article speaks to an encyclopedic level of notability. BD2412  T 20:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. ProQuest turns up his disqualification for 12 years for submitting false tax returns. Nothing else. Cielquiparle (talk) 11:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Tax fraud isn't exactly notable, unless it's some ground-breaking case. I doubt it. Oaktree b (talk) 19:33, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Right. Just mentioned as it's something other than a passing mention or a brief quote. And > nothing. Cielquiparle (talk) 20:28, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.