Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Edward Montgomery Ramirez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, but draftified at 's request. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Paul Edward Montgomery Ramirez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable postdoc per WP:ACADEMIC. Could find no notable articles of note (no citations), and no mention of his work besides those listed here, which include his own affiliations exclusively. The El 19 articles are very minor in scope, and I don't think they demonstrate his influence in the field. Probably an instance of TOOSOON given his age and employment history. PK650 (talk) 23:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PK650 (talk) 23:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. PK650 (talk) 23:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nicaragua-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:46, 4 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Almost certainly WP:TOOSOON at best for this 2019 PhD.  I don't see WP:NPROF nor any other notability criterion; citations certainly don't support. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 01:45, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't find any references that indicate he meets criteria set in WP:NPROF. Glendoremus (talk) 03:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF. I don't think the Nicaraguan award is enough, and that's all we have to do on. And what a coincidence that both the subject and article creator are postdocs at the same place. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep' Hi everyone, I made the article! The reason I put the article together is because of the subject's indigenous heritage - to be fair, quite soon after I began editing. I'd agree (now I have more knowledge) that WP:Academic isn't met, but I do think there is a case for inclusion for his role in championing his community through activism (some of which is through his academic work). To answer yes we both were at York at the same time for a few weeks, but I don't think there's a COI as we barely spoke. I'm very happy to do a re-write/move the page to draft (and happy for other people to edit too). All advice gratefully received and the existing comments are taken on board! Thanks for the support. (Lajmmoore (talk) 08:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC))
 * Delete does not currently meet the inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy per WP:TOOSOON. As an academic he is far too early in his career to be included. However, as an activist, he might be barely there; more work on that side is needed. Bearian (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi All, I've moved the page back to Draft to make some changes. Thanks very much! (Lajmmoore (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2020 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.