Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Ewing (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Draft already exists Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Paul Ewing (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Obviously fails general notability. 2 Guardian one-liners from 2004 do not constitute extensive coverage. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 11:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Move to Draft: namespace It feels as if the gentleman 'ought' to be notable, but I see nothing proven. An acceptable outcome is to migrate this to the Draft: space to allow the contributing editor to develop it. When/if migrated to Draft: space it will require added to the head to initiate the review process and assist the editor .  Fiddle   Faddle  20:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC) - See comment below.  Fiddle   Faddle  17:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and draft/userfy for now as my searches found nothing particularly good aside from this and, looking at his IMDb here, there's not much so he must be more a singer than actor. Summarily, there's not much at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  06:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: The draft is already available at Draft:Paul Ewing. I doubt it'll go anywhere either; he is clearly non-notable. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:49, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Under those circumstances, ones I had not checked, I am striking my original opinion and agreeing with you that we Delete this material form main namespace Fiddle   Faddle  17:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.