Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul G. Andrews (film producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Paul G. Andrews (film producer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NBIO. Provided sources barely even mention him, couldn't find anything better online, subject's most notable accomplishments appear to be producing a barely (if even) notable film and being a judge at a minor film festival.

I originally nominated this for PROD, dePROD by Belovvv, who provided the following sources. However, sources #1 and #2 appear to be about a different Paul Andrews (not to mention being a brief mention and a softball interview, respectively), and #3 is an interview hosted on YouTube (not reliable, not independent). signed,Rosguill talk 19:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 19:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 19:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 19:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

* Delete. Fails the parameters of WP:ENT + WP:FILMMAKER - has none of the following:
 * significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions,
 * large fan base/significant "cult" following, unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
 * Also,
 * Is not regarded as an important figure or widely cited by peers or successors,
 * not known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.
 * has not created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.
 * His body of work has not become a significant monument or won significant critical attention.
 * Agreeing with - the Paul G. Andrews who is the subject of this article has been conflated with at least one other individual. The Paul G. Andrews who is listed as producing "Boogie Man" has at least some black or brown hair, the music producer Paul Andrews mentioned in Ref #3 (Manhattan Digest) is a completely different person. Ref #1 also appears to be about this music producer Paul G. Andrews.  Refs #4 & #5 don't mention Mr. Andrews at all. Looking at Ref #s 6 & 7, all this does is mention that Mr. Andrews is a judge for the Sochi Film Festival in the shorts/documentary and that "Boogie Man" is up for a feature film award... Things that make you go hmmmmmm...how notable can this film & Mr. Andrews be if he's a judge in a festival where the film is in contention for an award... Ref #8 is a YouTube video, therefore not a reliable source and does nothing to prove notability.  And that just leaves the article with one ref, #2, which only mentions Mr. Andrews in passing.... Looks like to me that the article is basically unsourced. Shearonink (talk) 23:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. His credits are for obscure, poorly rated films, so it's not surprising he's received little, if any, media attention. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.