Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul G. Baker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to USS Paul G. Baker (DE-642). Consensus that the topic is not notable. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  13:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Paul G. Baker

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG as a one-time recipient of the Navy Cross. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep A warship was named after him which is a "significant award or honor and so passes WP:ANYBIO. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Navy Cross recipients for World War II. Fails WP:SOLDIER (Ltjg posthumously awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor" and the ship doesn't even have a page) and WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. Mztourist (talk) 03:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to USS Paul G. Baker (DE-642). All the pertinent info is included there. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOLDIER.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to USS Paul G. Baker (DE-642), fails GNG. Cavalryman (talk) 02:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee (talk) 05:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * obvious redirect per above. Mangoe (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.