Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Grosspietsch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Paul Grosspietsch

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unverifiable page, fails WP:V and WP:BIO. Pages was proposed for deletion for "Unverifiable, I am not able to find sources for the author, or even evidence that the book by Estiks (source 1) exists, or the third source, the book by Neuhuys and Rodestroh. Normally, for every even slightly notable artist, it is not hard to find at least some online confirmation of their existence." Contested, with the removal of the two sources I couldn't find any evidence for, and the addition of a weblink to the Jewish Historical Museum, which sadly gives no results when you look for Grosspietsch. Fram (talk) 09:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I am unable to find any sources that would match up with the description of this person. Fails the fundamental policy of verifiability. -- Whpq (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Absolutely no assertion of notability, & none likely to emerge 60 years after his death. Johnbod (talk) 04:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.