Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Gustafson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Paul Gustafson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not sufficiently noteable. Geronimo20 (talk) 00:28, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Neutral, leaning towards the D-word. The main question is (ignoring the cruft about teaching and children's books) whether the subject is a notable pike angler... but I'm not sure that the single decent source (the Telegraph article) holds enough weight on its own (and Googling doesn't yield much else). This article has tested my adherence to policy and certainly stretched the boundaries of AGF so I wouldn't be too sorry to see it go, but I'm staying neutral for the mo. OBM | blah blah blah 09:26, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Neutral Living in the local area, I thought he was more notable for his books myself. I don't particularly care about the article but describing is writing as 'cruft' seems a bit POV. 137.205.17.89 (talk) 13:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: 137.205.17.89 (talk • contribs) is a suspected sockpuppet of the creator of this article --Geronimo20 (talk) 07:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC).


 * Delete - Not notable enough to have his own page. He is probably only notable around Oxfordshire for his books and maybe angling but that's about it. I haven't heard anything about him for years. -- TwentiethApril1986  (talk)  14:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete The books are almost unknown--and apparently self-published. DGG (talk) 18:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.