Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Harris (Lawyer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete, does not assert notability. Prodego talk  18:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Paul Harris (Lawyer)
Extremly non-notable and vague, with no sources, external links, or citations. Thetruthbelow (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per my nom. Thetruthbelow[[Image:Wikipedia minilogo.gif|20px]] (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The user Ivankoo who created the article appears to have left it. No other users seem to have expanded it either. Any information if at all should be placed on National Lawyers Guild.-- A n d e h 21:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some sources. TruthbringerToronto 21:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP. Currently nothing showing how he is more notable than a random professor. See WP:HOLE. Stifle (talk) 11:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficiently notable.--Runcorn 17:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.