Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Haughey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Paul Haughey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of reliable independent sources about the subject. Does not meet WP:GNG. Guy (Help!) 22:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. I couldn't find anything to show where this person is notable. There's not really anything about there about him, his work, or the book. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  02:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. The subject fails WP:GNG, there are no claims made (or evidence provided) that this person is notable or their works exceptional or that they warrant inclusion in an encyclopaedia.Pupsbunch (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.