Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Hoeprich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Paul Hoeprich

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

NN person, little content or context, poor sources. delete UtherSRG (talk) 19:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. Nothing in the article even makes a claim that he might merit an article.  -- Jayron  32  19:38, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I could find no independent, reliable sources that would back up a claim of notability. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 19:45, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I also searched of independent, reliable sources, including NewsBank and Google News Archives, and found nothing to back up a claim of notability. Cbl62 (talk) 23:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete While what sources I found show that Hoeprich is well appreciated in the Scottsdale Unified School District, he has not achieved Wikipedia criteria for notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Perhaps this individual should be notable for his work with young people, but at present he does not meet Wiki standards. Evalpor (talk) 16:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per above. Joe Chill (talk) 20:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.