Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Jorion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. (aeropa gitica) 23:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Paul Jorion
Apparently non-notable academic who fails WP:PROF. I cannot find from independent sources any biography of him, or anything that suggest that the books he has authored are well-known or significant. Kimchi.sg 01:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC) Initially nominated for deletion on 19 August 2006. Relisted here for further consensus. Thanks.-- Samir  धर्म 07:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dionyseus 02:36, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Author of at least 4 books one of which is with McGraw-Hill a major publisher.  While  probably isn't the most independent source, most of it is verifiable from other sources.  I can't verify the claim of an article in the Wall St Journal  but it seems plausible.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  16:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, no requirement that biographies must be available easily or on the net. Four books is enough, someone should add the ISBN's so we can how widespread the distribution was. Wjhonson 18:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Close enough, might be notable, but not because of book count.-Kmaguir1 08:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep McGraw-Hill is a MAJOR publisher of academic books. Allon FambrizziAllon Fambrizzi
 * Keep per above comments, McGraw-Hill is nowhere near being vanity press; this person is notable. RFerreira 06:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.