Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul K. Sybrowsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 14:27, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Paul K. Sybrowsky

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG as there is no significant non-routine coverage of him. Collaboratio (talk) 10:09, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as a university president he passes default notability for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:22, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTMEMORIAL applies, and I'm not certain that the former president of a private school passes WP:GNG lacking anything of note. Simonm223 (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Being the president of a university is a clear pass of academic notability criteria 6.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:48, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Concur with JPL on this one. Being president of a major academic institution passes WP:NACADEMIC. Sources exist and simply need to be added. Rollidan (talk) 03:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - per above. Passes WP:NACADEMIC #6: The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. MarginalCost (talk) 11:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep I think WP:NACADEMIC is very silly to favor school administrators with automatic notability that way, but this isn't the venue for that debate. Simonm223 (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I sourced some stuff to Virginia newspapers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NACADEMIC.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.