Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Knobel (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G4 speedy delete looks valid here and no new evidence to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 08:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Paul Knobel
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per the first deletion discussion, both subject and subject's published works are non-notable. Could an admin check and see if this page is eligible for WP:G4? -- Non-Dropframe   talk   21:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Knobel hasn't become any more notable since the last AFD was closed 3 weeks ago. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 20:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.