Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Luna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Paul Luna

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It is hard to rad through the fact that this is written by a nearly-WP:SPA in a promotional way, but it doesn't appear that there are the sources available online to establish he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 08:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Food and drink,  and Georgia (U.S. state). Owen&times;  &#9742;  09:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Still opening restaurants in 2021 that I can find, but nothing about a "mad genius" or whatever flowery terms thrown around in the article. Very spammy article with nothing for notability here. Oaktree b (talk) 02:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep There's enough sustained coverage in Atlanta-area papers to satisfy WP:GNG., , , , . Jfire (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Yeah, WP:PROMO article, but subject has pretty good coverage in the area. TLA  (talk) 03:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.