Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Masterman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No defense of the article after over 2 weeks. The orig. ed. was notified, and is active at WP, but hasn't defended. Time to finish.  DGG ( talk ) 06:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Paul Masterman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable consultant specialist, though the article doesn't meet WP:BIO and WP:N. It doesn't meet the guidelines. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 04:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 I agree. There is no encyclopedic value in this entry. --Rcalvert (talk) 08:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

 There's no reason for an article on this guy - not notable

--90.203.55.106 (talk) 06:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @152  · 02:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 03:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 03:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete- Fails WP:N as well as, WP:POLITICIANS.keystoneridin! (talk) 04:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: as Keystoneridin states, the subject is not notable per WP:N or WP:POLITICIANS. — AustralianRupert (talk) 05:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete. No encyclopedic value whatsoever McMarcoP (talk) 09:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.