Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul McKenna Band


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. With this being relisted twice there's only a small amount of comments and the discussion is obviously leaning towards keep. I consider this more of a contested WP:PROD. WP:NPSAR. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 03:07, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Paul McKenna Band

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page has been tagged for notability for over eight years. Two speedy deletion nominations have been declined (September 2008 with the rationale "UK airplay, award, some coverage" and June 2009 "Being signed to a notable label is indication of importance/significance") but I cannot find any significant coverage of this band after the best part of a decade. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 21:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I've managed to recover archived versions of two dead links of refs and discovered one new one. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep There seems to be quite a bit of coverage of the band worldwide including reviews -  (need to click on correct link), etc. There are more as I stopped looking for more after a while, and it should qualify under WP:GNG. Hzh (talk) 22:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 04:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep At least some of these additional references, along with the existing ones, are enough indication for me of GNG to get off the fence. It would be useful to add some to the article under External Links, until such time as they are use to expand and verify it. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:39, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.