Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Musgrave

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:29, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)

Paul Musgrave
I am not notable enough for this. Paul Musgrave 22:37, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep but don't mind either way. --JuntungWu 01:01, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I am not a week keep, I'm a strong delete!--Paul Musgrave 01:15, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Why did you resign? Uncle G 15:06, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC)
 * Keep seems reasonably notable. 7,910 Google hits... and before anyone mentions it, I know there's more than one Paul Musgrave in the universe, but the first page at least was all this guy. Article shows further indication of notability, and it's neither a stub, POV, nor poorly-written.  I say keep. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  02:00, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article doesn't establish notability. Martg76 02:41, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as requested. Gazpacho 02:48, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable, but needs additional bio details eg date/place of birth.--Centauri 04:57, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: a talented young man on his way to great things. We'll have an article about him in a decade or two. Til then let's hold off. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:55, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete.Mikkalai 08:13, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * How did this article come into being, Paul? Who created it? Someone you know? If someone you don't know created it, to me that might suggest a degree of notability. Everyking 09:48, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * ... We want information. Uncle G 15:06, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC)
 * Not sure, and unimportant. By the 'average college professor' test (or, for that matter, the Google Groups test, given that very few of the references there are about me), I fall pretty far short of the standards for inclusion.--Paul Musgrave 15:39, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * sigh. The youth of today!  You don't watch enough television. Uncle G 16:01, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC)
 * Userfy ... er ... oh. Uncle G 15:06, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC)
 * I already have a user page, and a personal webpage for the truly interested.--Paul Musgrave 15:39, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I know. That's why the "... er ... oh" was there.  Uncle G 16:01, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable enough yet. DJ Clayworth 21:34, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Having a person who is the topic of an article show up and request deletion of that article may or may not be enough to justify deletion by itself. However, that, when combined with the already questionable notability, leads me to say that this article should be deleted. - RedWordSmith 21:57, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Del. Not yet notable. -Jerzy(t) 02:56, 2005 Jan 24 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Brookie 20:10, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see any reasonable claim of notability here. Alarm 22:51, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, questionable notability at best. Megan1967 22:55, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can't argue with him about his own notability. dbenbenn | talk 19:03, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.