Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Niel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ansh 666 08:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Paul Niel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Less than three passing mentions. No WP:SIGCOV doesn't satisfy notability guidelines WP:CREATIVE Lapablo (talk) 18:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:50, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:50, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Keep - The subject is a well known public figure in Hong Kong and has significant coverage from reliable sources including South China Morning Post, Hong Kong's leading newspaper, which meets WP:SIGCOV. Meohpol (talk) 20:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Keep, Passes WP:GNG, It appears to be notable as i found more than 5 in-depth aritcles, not just mentions. , ,,,, Legion X (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  00:37, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Keep - Has enough coverage and meets WP:GNG. MA Javadi (talk) 18:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.