Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Pîrşan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Paul Pîrşan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:ACADEMIC Night of the Big Wind  talk  00:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - I have no particular attachment to this article (or to Alexandru Moisuc), but doesn't WP:PROF criterion 6 imply that university heads tend to be notable? And he is the head: a rector is what Romanian university presidents are called, and he definitely is now rector. Of course, it's not an especially significant university; even at the level of agronomic institutes in Romania, Timişoara and Iaşi are second-tier (below Bucharest and Cluj-Napoca), and since WP:PROF speaks of heads of "major academic institutions", we might say USAMV-Banat doesn't qualify and thus Pîrşan shouldn't have an article on the basis of his position. No vote from me for now, just some ideas. - Biruitorul Talk 02:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 15:04, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 15:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 15:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  04:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.