Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Parmar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 21:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Paul Parmar

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This person does not appear to meet the notability criteria. There are sources, but none of them meet the definition of a reliable source, and they don't appear to be independent of the subject. I googled and couldn't find better sources. Prod removed by creator without sources or information added. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I get all of 28 unique Google hits for "Funky Buddha Group" and nothing at all on Google News (including archives). Surprise, surprise. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete His films may be notable, but he himself gets no independent coverage.--Sethacus 16:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to have put money into some big films. This doesn't make him notable.  The Hollywood reporter external link which is supposed to be an artical about him ends up going to a website with a business card. Worldfamousdirector 03:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.