Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Paulson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 22:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Paul Paulson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor politician. Appears to fail WP:POLITICIAN. red dogsix (talk) 02:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:POLITICIAN. Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 03:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete again per WP:POLITICIAN. Orange County Committeemen don't qualify. Gargleafg (talk) 03:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   03:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   03:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   03:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Very low-level politician with no notability. AusLondonder (talk) 06:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: No notability. Fails WP:GNG and Notability_(people). Please see WP:POLOUTCOMES. Otr500 (talk) 11:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. When it comes to WP:NPOL, we have to evaluate this under criterion #2 — "local political figures" — but at that level of office, the difference between a keep and a delete is not "holds office ergo automatic pass", but hinges on the depth and quality of reliable sourcing that can be shown about their holding of the office. But none of the sourcing here is adequate, and merely being a candidate for a statewide position, where the election is still 1.5 years away so the primaries haven't even happened yet, is not grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself either. No prejudice against recreation in November 2018 if he wins the statewide Commissioner of Agriculture election, but nothing here is enough today. Bearcat (talk) 18:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:POLITICIAN.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.