Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Rawlinson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Paul Rawlinson
(a)not notable, (b) possibly created by self (user PaulieRaw) Elf | Talk 00:02, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed. Vanity page, non notable bio. -- Jay  (Reply)  00:07, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Royal Blue   T / C  00:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Autobiography, non-notable, vanity. Camillus (talk) 00:23, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 01:22, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:BIO. &mdash;ERcheck @ 01:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: likely vanity, does not assert notability.  Pagra shtak  02:57, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO. PJM 03:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO and WP:V; also remove any "advertising" inserted by him (i.e., at Dog behaviourist). -- Kinu t /c  07:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This page is actually a repost of deleted material, and should have been tagged with db-repost. Isopropyl 07:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Isopropyl. --Cymsdale 11:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Isopropyl. --AySz88 ^ -  ^  15:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete if Isopropyl is right (I didn't see anything in Special:Log&type=delete&page=Paul%20Rawlinson, though). Otherwise, userfy & delete --Karnesky 16:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per no, could be self article American Patriot 1776 18:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Dont delete The article compliments Dog behaviourist article, Operant Conditioning and training techniques. The reason Paul Rawlinson is used above any other behaviourist is purely arbitarty, the article is desmonstrative of a modern behaviourist and reflects and compliments the Dog behaviourist article by allowing the reader access to an increased level of information. I would not have been able with any conviction to write about other behaviourists as many are quite secretive in regards to their work. However, Stan Rawlinson is well published I do have information on him and if you would prefer it I will change this page to reflect him as he is widley published in the dog and sporting press. isopropyl is not correct this a first post. PS the shorthand area is heavily biased to the negative. Paulieraw 10:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Please read the above-cited WP:BIO and WP:V to see Wikipedia's policies. Any arguments for including an article on a person would need to meet these criteria.  Elf | Talk 20:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy, WP:BIO. Stifle 13:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.