Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Rotterdam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Paul Rotterdam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article appears, on the face of it, to have been started by a spammer, re-created after deletion by a different spammer who edits all the same articles, and buffed up by the subject's PR. Guy (Help!) 23:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * What reason for deletion are you proposing?104.163.155.42 (talk) 08:19, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  23:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  23:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  23:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  23:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)


 * No comment as to notability right yet, but the bombs are going to start falling. L3X1 (distænt write)  23:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I see some stuff, it appears a lot of it will be in German. L3X1 (distænt write)  00:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Google books has lots of entries. It helps to search under "Paul Zwietnig Rotterdam". I saw one monograph published by randomHouse in Germany, and another entry was for "who's Who in Art" . The sources are certainly there to establish at least WP:GNG, even if the article is currently nauseating.104.163.155.42 (talk) 07:11, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty in Google Books to establish notability. --Michig (talk) 07:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep It may be started by not-good -editors but the person is indeed notable in many respects. I have added his entry from German National Library, and found this source and another one from Leopold Museum, one of the most important Museums in Austria. The article's external link section also has many valuable resources when expanding the article. In addition, the German version of the article has valuable referenced content –Ammarpad (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above. Page needs cleanup and more/better references, but this artist is notable. = paul2520 (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.