Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Sanchez (ice hockey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 11:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Paul Sanchez (ice hockey)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable player, no evidence he meets the GNG, fails WP:NHOCKEY going away. Created by an editor with a history of dubious hockey-related article creations, and for players competing on national teams that play far below the top pool at the Worlds/Olympics, the only level for which NHOCKEY accords presumptive notability. Therefore fails WP:GNG per only citing WP:ROUTINE sources. AaronWikia (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment The subject satisfies #6 of NHOCKEY, the phrasing of the term does not exclude players who competed in official tournaments other than worlds or the Olympics. The Winter Asian Games is a regional sanctioned tournament. However the article is poorly sourced and includes claims (some of which would imply notability, such as being the top scorer in the nation) are not in the source. Article has WP:OR issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hariboneagle927 (talk • contribs) 07:32, February 26, 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Dr Strauss   talk  13:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment The article is now sourced stating that it was the Philippines first international tournament and that he not only lead the team in scoring but the entire tournament. Doing this in his first year as a rookie is an extreme accomplishment and if he continues at his current level he will be a lock for the Philippines Sports Hall of Fame.  This will meet a two of the requirements of NHOCKEY, judging by other players on that site is more than enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tc1491 (talk • contribs) 14:51, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: No, this doesn't meet criterion #6, and we long since started to steam up at how many times we've had to tweak the criteria against each fresh attempt to abuse it or reinterpret it. Criterion #6, from original intent through eternal consensus, has always referred to the top pool at the Worlds only.   Ravenswing   20:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete In no way meets criteion #6, it is for events "such as" the Olympics, or, a linked term, that if clicked on explains that it currently includes the top 16 nations in the world. This is rather specific, but does leaves it open to other tournaments that could be argued to be "such as".  A list that has two tournaments, that only the top few nations play in, does not include just any sanctioned event that occurs.18abruce (talk) 21:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable hockey player. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   16:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.