Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Schedl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Paul Schedl

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Old unreferenced BLP tagged in January 2018. The only external links provided are to the subject's bio and a list of faculty members on his employer's web site. G-searches turned up plenty of incidental mentions (research papers in journals etc) but no significant coverage in reliable sources. Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  02:11, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. 22 papers with over 100 citation each gives a pass of WP:Prof in this high cited field. Nominator is advised to carry out WP:Before prior to making further nominations. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC).
 * Keep Seems to meet WP:NPROF, and whilst the article is in a poor state, WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, department head at Princeton, easily passed NSCHOLAR-1 on citation record.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 14:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Scopus metrics for all his coauthors with 20+ papers:
 * Total citations: avg: 7029, med: 2694, Schedl: 10613.
 * Total papers: avg: 106, med: 48, S: 203.
 * h-index: avg: 34, med: 26, S: 58.
 * Top citations: 1st: avg: 676, med: 350, S: 476. 2nd: avg: 398, med: 256, S: 327. 3rd: avg: 292, med: 186, S: 312. 4th: avg: 250, med: 160, S: 281. 5th: avg: 214, med: 134, S: 244.
 * Top first-author: avg: 351, med: 148, S: 165.
 * Meets C1. JoelleJay (talk) 16:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. per arguments above, meets WP:NPROF. --hroest 01:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.