Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Tamanian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 10:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tamanian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not remotely clear how he passes the WP:GNG no evidence of notability. Theroadislong (talk) 16:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this has actually existed for quite some time and it should've frankly been deleted sooner, there's nothing at all here for any applicable notability since the works have and are not permanently collected thus there's simply nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  17:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – Does not meet WP:BASIC. Several source searches are not providing the coverage needed to qualify an article. There's this source published by a news source that the subject has republished on his website, but not finding much else in terms of significant coverage. North America1000 01:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:38, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient indepent sources to establish any kind of notability.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG and appears to be promotional. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  01:57, 24 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.