Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Turner (wrestling)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 09:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Paul Turner (wrestling)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable wrestling referee. Non-notable as a former wrestler. Just non-notable. (I believe the speedy was improperly removed, as there's still no claim of notability. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. - Richard Cavell 22:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm guessing the ECWA Hall of Fame induction is the claim to notability. However, it's really tenuous. ECWA's reputation rests largely on the fact that some participants in their Super 8 tournament have gone on to be fairly successful (in indie wrestling terms), but I don't think that implies that any of their referees are necessarily notable. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 06:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There are only a few wrestling referees I would class as meriting an article on notability grounds. Mr Turner is not one of them. ECWA is a respected company but on a minor level and I can't see that its HoF gives Mr Turner notability according to Wikipedia guidelines. Suriel1981 11:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Govvy 12:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete in that case. I can see some valid points.  Sorry, still new to this Wiki stuff ;) Goodolgm 17:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.