Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Udouj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Paul Udouj

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Does not meet GNG or specialized notability criteria. I technically contested my own prod by pulling it for a CSD when I could find nothing of value for sources, and the CSD was declined. There is one non-trivial Google hit (to news in his local area only), and the rest of his Google hits for the first three pages are almost all personal pages (Twitter, FB, LinkedIn, Flickr) and mirrors of WP. There is nothing to substantiate anything stated in the article except for one interview (as noted above, and in the refs). Thus, it seems that he is: a "rapper" with no known releases; a "record producer" with no known credits; and a "businessman" with no company (he was apparently a CFO for a small company at one point, but there is no relevant information available, and notability is not inherited anyhow). In short, he meets neither GNG nor any of the specialized criteria for his supposed employment areas. MSJapan (talk) 01:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 00:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing past a little local interest coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.