Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Vanezis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Paul Vanezis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable, vanity page. I believe the Doctor Who Restoration Team article is valid and notable. However, individual pages for members seems most unencyclopedic. No sources either. Troughtonfan (talk) 16:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete - Fails WP:BIO. Common sense also tells me that this subject isn't notable as a director/producer.  Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 16:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - As for reasons I stated above, and also OlYeller21 makes very strong points too. Troughtonfan (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources, not significantly worthy of a Wikipedia entry. Newsonicscrewdriver2 (talk) 10:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  19:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per Ecclesiastes 1:2.  Them From  Space  19:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment:What the hell is this discussion? Bunch of socks, and a guy using biblical passages to justify a deletion?? This reeks of disruption.Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 10:25, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete- Obscure member of unknown team with no references or citations. K&#39;Anpo (talk) 13:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.