Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul W. Draper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus.  howch e  ng   {chat} 22:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Paul W. Draper
not quite a speedy delete, so put to vote J\/\/estbrook       19:29, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 
 * Keep; Notable, if barely. Plus, I kind of liked the demo. Tom Harrison (talk) 22:01, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete little more than a bio and an advert, no real claim to notability. Stifle 02:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, FPBot (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Mindmatrix 21:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Mo0 [ talk ] 22:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Article about a magician, written by user "realmagic". I wonder if there could be any connection?... OK, userfy if there is any evidence the user is going to stick around, but really this is just garden-variety vanity spam. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 21:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep magic expert on TV. -- JJay 21:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, bio+ad+totally unsourced. Sdedeo (tips) 22:20, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to have made the press a few times Jcuk 10:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NeoJustin 04:38, December 29, 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.