Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Wasserman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. by nominator. After a search the nominator was able to find proper sources for notability so I'll take it as a withdrawal, being a stub isn't much of a reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) treelo  radda  20:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Paul Wasserman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

not notable -- Gmatsuda (talk) 08:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * comment Perhaps not, but it would help to have some detail of why you think so. DGG (talk) 11:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: Ack! I did a Google search before I posted this AfD, but I must've mistyped because I just did the search again and found enough in the results to indicate that this person is at least more notable than I thought. Still not much of an article, but... -- Gmatsuda (talk) 11:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.