Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Whitehouse (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Paul Whitehouse (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unneeded disambiguation, there are no articles that link here and a hatnote has been made to bypass it. Tavix (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Unwanted disambig. South Bay (talk) 01:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Doesn't hurt. And useful for research purpose since it appears in Category:Human name disambiguation pages. --Edcolins (talk) 12:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Reply But it isn't useful! There are absolutely no articles that link here. A hatnote does the trick. I don't see what the category has to do with anything, as that category isn't for research purposes but for editing purposes. Tavix (talk) 21:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Two valid bluelinks are sufficient for a dab page. To a non-UK eye, there appears no primary use (other than the implication of an undisambiguated article name for an article that was simply created first) - from WP:DAB: However if there are two topics for a term but neither is considered the primary topic, then a disambiguation page is used. B.Wind (talk) 04:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A disambiguation page isn't useful if there's only two items on it; hatnotes are fine for that. As Tavix notes, there are no inward links. Stifle (talk) 12:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hatnote should be fine. -Yupik (talk) 01:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.